Prepare and submit an analysis of the coaching process model in order to make connections between theory and practice and to critically assess the utility of the proposed model.
Criteria Ratings Points
Coaching Model Flow Chart
70 to >63 pts
Advanced
The comments provided on the flow chart exhibit thorough reflection and analysis; the comments also provide specific examples applicable to the student’s sport/coaching practice.
63 to >58 pts
Proficient
The comments provided on the flow chart exhibit a general reflection and analysis; the comments also provide some specific examples applicable to the student’s sport/coaching practice.
58 to >0 pts
Developing
The comments provided on the flow chart exhibit a vague reflection and analysis; the comments provide a few and/or no specific examples applicable to the student’s sport/coaching practice.
0 pts
Not Present
70 pts
Critical Analysis
70 to >63 pts
Advanced
There is a thorough critical analysis regarding the utility of the model for coaching the student’s sport according to (1) Sport Specificity, (2) Systematic Coaching Behaviors, and (3) Adapting the Model.
63 to >58 pts
Proficient
There is a general critical analysis regarding the utility of the model for coaching the student’s sport according to (1) Sport Specificity, (2) Systematic Coaching Behaviors, and (3) Adapting the Model.
58 to >0 pts
Developing
There is a vague critical analysis regarding the utility of the model for coaching the student’s sport according to (1) Sport Specificity, (2) Systematic Coaching Behaviors, and (3) Adapting the Model.
0 pts
Not Present
70 pts
Grammar, Structure, and Spelling
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
• Assignment is well-written with correct word choices, good phrasing, few grammatical errors, and few spelling errors.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
• Assignment is well-written with a few errors with word choice, phrasing, grammar, and/or spelling; errors do not distract or detract from the overall meaning.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
• The assignment is poorly written. There are numerous errors with word choices, phrasing, grammar, and/or spelling; errors distract and detract from the overall meaning.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Format 30 to >27 pts
Advanced
• Current APA guidelines are followed. Assignment is 5 pages.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
• Current APA guidelines are followed with few errors. Assignment is 3–4 pages.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
• Current APA guidelines followed with frequent errors or not followed. Assignment is 1–2 pages.
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
Total Points: 200
Coaching Model Analysis Grading Rubric | SMGT621_B01_202520
,
SMGT 621
Coaching Model Analysis Assignment Instructions
For this assignment you will prepare and submit an analysis of the coaching process model in your text. This assignment is intended to help you make connections between theory and practice and to critically assess the utility of the proposed model. Your analysis must include 2 sections in current APA format:
1. An edited version of the Coaching Model Flow Chart (2 pages, found under Additional Recourses in the assignment) and
2. A critical analysis of the utility of the model that includes a partial redesign (3 pages).
For Section 1 : Using the Coaching Model Flow Chart (provided under Additional Recources and adapted from your course text) you will make comments on the document by reflecting on and analyzing your own coaching practice. The comments you make in the flow chart should be specific examples of applying the model to your sport and your coaching practice, to the extent that this is possible.
· When not possible, you must comment on the reason why aptness does not apply and relate to #3 in Section 2 below.
· Note: The comments must be shown on the actual Coaching Model Flow Chart. It is advised that you print the chart, write your comments on the chart, and then scan and upload the chart to your computer. You can submit this with the second portion of your assignment.
For Section 2 : Using the 3 sections outlined in Chapter 7 of your text, critically assess the utility of the model for coaching your sport according to the following:
1. Sport Specificity,
2. Systematic Coaching Behaviors; and
3. Adapting the Model
· Note: This section must include the re-design of 1 component of the model that you have identified as not apt for your coaching context in Section 1 (use examples on page 157 of your text as examples).
Please review the Coaching Model Analysis Grading Rubric for further information.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
,
Recruitment by coach
Third party referral
Athlete approach
Organizational appointment
Organizational progression
Coach appointment
Situational review
Performance history
Initial expectations
Organizational need/demand
Coach/athlete
need/demand
Agreement
· Contract
· Boundaries
· Conditions
Situational Analysis
Comparative standards
Resources
Facilities
Finance
Sport structures
Strategic plan
Organizational needs
Proceed
t
Introductory programme
Goal-setting
Situational analysis
Group goals
Athlete ambitions
Coach goals
Goal accommodation process
Coach evaluation of potential
Organizational goals
Implications from initial expectations
Goals
Short term
Medium term
Long term
Component content and balance
Competition programme
Pre-planning model
Integration of
· Component staging
· Planning cycles
· Immediate targets
· Activity patterns
Year or multi-year plan
Extrapolate first implementation cycle
Extrapolate first implementation cycle
Schedule cycle
Detail microcycle
Initiation phase
Strategic planning phase phase
Termination
Priorities set
Goal-setting phase
Non-intervention contact
Athlete-led activity
Competition episode
Coach Intervention
Extrapolate new cycle
t
t
Training unit preparation
Regulation phase
Preparation phase
From evaluation
Conduct session
Manage load input
To goals
Competition phase
Plan
Execute
Feedback
Progress
End Management
· Organization
· Athlete-related support role
· Forward administration
· Recording
Initial management
· Situational assessment
· Contingency planning
· Organization
Training adaptation
Load n Load 1
Adaptation Training Component Adaptation Training Component
Next unit starting capacity
Previous unit end capacity
Evaluation Recording
Contest management
Plan
Execute
Coach role input
Feedback
Progress
Recording
Pre-contest management
· Strategy rehearsal
· Pre-start checklist
· Selection amendments
Post-contest management
· Athlete support role
· Forward administration
Decision point
· Pre-determined schedule
· Performance model
· Environmental circum.
· Athlete – current status;
· Organism readiness
Completion unit preparation
· Event strategy
· Performance expectations
Goal derived expectations
Strategic mental model
Threshold feedback
· Schedule completion
· Athlete response
· Performance outcome
· Results
t
t
Completion of cycle
Adapted from Lyle & Cushion (2017)