- American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Sexual dysfunctionsLinks to an external site.. In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.).
- American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Personality disordersLinks to an external site.. In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.).
- American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Paraphilic disordersLinks to an external site.. In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.).
- Boland, R. Verdiun, M. L. & Ruiz, P. (2022). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (12th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
- Walden University. (2020). College of Nursing practicum manual: Master of science in nursing (MSN) and post-master’s certificate programsLinks to an external site.. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/fieldexperience/son/formsanddocuments
- Walden University Field Experience. (2020a). Field experience: College of NursingLinks to an external site.. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/fieldexperience/son/home
- Walden University Field Experience. (2020b). Student practicum resources: NP student orientationLinks to an external site.. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/StudentPracticum/NP_StudentOrientation
Reflections on Evidence-Based Practice, Clinical Practice Guidelines, a
As an advanced practice provider, you may encounter situations where your clinical judgment differs from your colleagues. For this reflective assignment, you will begin to gain experience in recognizing Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for Standards of Care from evidence-based practices. You will critically evaluate a treatment plan you feel your preceptor may have deviated from Clinical Practice Guidelines and develop your own clinical reasoning skills. This assignment will begin to prepare you for next quarter's implementation of treatment planning and interventions in patient cases. Keep what you learned from this assignment in your critical thinking processes for future Practicum Experiences.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To Prepare
· Identify a Case:
· Choose a patient case from your clinical experience where you and your preceptor approached the treatment plan differently.
· Research evidence-based information pertinent to your chosen patient for treatment Clinical Practice Guidelines and Standards of Care.
Submission Requirements:
· Length: 3-4 pages, double-spaced, APA format.
· Cite at least 3 peer-reviewed sources to support your analysis.
Evaluation Criteria:
· Clarity and completeness of the case summary.
· Depth of analysis and comparison between treatment plans.
· Use of evidence-based rationale for your alternative plan.
· Reflection on learning and future application.
· Proper use of APA formatting and references.
Assignment
Write a paper:
Briefly summarize:
· The patient case, including all relevant information: the patient's history, assessment findings, medications, any pertinent testing, presenting symptoms, and the final diagnosis (ensure patient confidentiality).
Compare Treatment Plans:
· Describe your preceptor’s recommended treatment plan and interventions.
· Explain the alternative treatment plan you would have recommended as a nurse practitioner based upon Clinical Practice Guidelines and Standards of Care.
Justify Your Approach:
· Use evidence-based guidelines, clinical research, and relevant literature to support your alternative plan.
· Discuss why you believe your approach would be effective, considering the patient’s history, condition, and individual needs. Reflect on Differences:
· Analyze the differences between your plan and your preceptor’s.
· Consider factors such as clinical experience, knowledge, patient-centered care, and the influence of evidence-based practice in decision-making.
Lessons Learned:
· Reflect on how this experience has influenced your clinical practice and approach to treatment planning.
· Discuss how you can apply what you learned to future patient care.
· How might you approach another provider professionally in the future when you find treatment plans differing during collaboration on the patient case?
By Day 7
Submit your Reflection Paper. You do not need your preceptor's signature for this assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK9Assgn2_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
PRAC_6635_Week9_Assignment2_Rubric
|
PRAC_6635_Week9_Assignment2_Rubric |
||||||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe case summary is clear, complete, and includes all relevant information. It covers the patient's history, assessment findings, medications, any pertinent testing, presenting symptoms, and the final diagnosis. |
|
10 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvide a thorough, insightful comparison between the alternative plan and the preceptor’s approach, analyzing key differences in clinical experience, knowledge, and patient-centered care. Thoughtfully discuss how evidence-based practice influenced decision-making in both plans, demonstrating an understanding of its role in patient care. |
|
25 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on the differences between alternative treatment plan and preceptor’s plan. Critically analyze the rationale behind each approach and identify how these differences inform clinical decision-making and professional growth in patient care. |
|
25 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on the lessons learned from comparing treatment plan approaches, assessing how the experience has influenced clinical decision-making and identify how these insights will guide approach to future patient care and collaboration with other healthcare providers. |
|
25 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
|
5 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
|
5 pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Support the alternative plan with at least three evidence-based guidelines or peer-reviewed journal articles. All sources must be current (no more than five years old), credible, and clearly aligned with the patient’s case. |
|
5 pts |
||||
|
Total Points: 100 |
,[removed]